Change.org Product VP on Driving Product Velocity (Part 2)

Once you have mediocrity and clutter cleared away, alignment is the next factor to drive product velocity. If anything, I believe the lack of alignment is the top reason for failure.

How many times have you heard these dueling arguments?

“I wish we would move forward faster” versus “Yeah, but we need to maintain quality.”

This represents a lack of alignment. These conflicts appear in a variety of forms, such as quality vs. speed, incremental change vs. big swings, and so on. We get entrenched in positions that tend to slow things down.

Now, there’s a spectacular way to break down misalignment. But first, we need to grasp some team basics.

Game Plan Clarity

At change.org, I use sports team analogies. We may have different tasks, but our objective is the same, that is, to score more goals than the other team. So we want to:

  • Win – Top Line Metrics (e.g., revenue goals, user growth, account activation).
  • Score a goal – Meaningful increment towards winning. (e.g., a new feature that delivers a 20 percent core metric pop).
  • Shot on goal – The smallest amount of work possible to determine if something (e.g., feature, MVP, prototype) will score a goal.

The next step is to quantify the effort. For instance:

  • We need ten goals to win
  • Estimated % of shots that will be a goal = 10
  • Shots on goal required to win = 100

These objectives help align your team. Your numbers will vary, but it helps to quantify things.

This process creates a shared language to unify players. It also provides a way to measure efforts. I ask each team: what’s winning look like at the end of the quarter for you? How many shots do you need to take? How do you justify your shot to goal ratio?

The result is a roadmap for success, and we all pull in the same direction. There are no more arguments about speed vs. quality. Instead, we’re all working to take shots on goal to win.

Offense Vs. Defense

Teamwork can be further defined by offensive, defensive and other types of work. Here how we identified these at change.org:

  • Offensive – Creating value for the user, business or product. Short term shots, mid-term strategic investments, long term architecture evolutions.
  • Defensive – Preemptive actions (spam management, fake news, etc.) and external factor reactions (FB algorithm change).
  • Any work not towards delivering direct value to users or business (interviews, onboarding, reviews, program, etc.).

Now comes the good part.

Avalanche!

Inevitably, as you develop a bunch of ideas, product development and the ability to deliver grind down over time. Why? Even though everyone is aligned, they’re still not completely unified.

When each team focuses on its task too intensely for too long, the organization gets stagnant and silos start to take shape. What you need is an avalanche to shake things up. This means dedicating the entire organization to a single objective.

This focused effort leads to better collaboration and speed which lasts over time. We all work on getting specific ideas shipped. It’s an excellent motivator for alignment.

Avalanches work when:

  • Everybody’s all in 100%. Really.
  • Set high stakes, clear goals.
  • Fixed period, set end date.
  • Scheduled clean-up & learning afterward.
  • Make it fun.

Bang a Gong

During our avalanche – we called it Oktoberfest – I showed up to the office in lederhosen. Junior engineers swapped ideas with the CTO. It was not a threatening environment, but rather a reason to bind together and celebrate. With every shipment, we rang a victory gong. We moved forward in critical areas at incredible speed.

The process lasted six weeks, and it built interconnected muscles that continue to work to this day. I can’t wait for the next avalanche.

 

Click here for Part 1

Click here for Part 3

About the speaker
Nick Allardice Change.org, Product VP Member

Nick Allardice is the VP of Product at Change.org - the world’s largest and fastest growing dedicated platform for people power and social change. Prior to joining Change.org, he founded Live Below the Line - an international online campaign that fights extreme poverty. He held leadership roles at Make Poverty History, The Oaktree Foundation and OzGREEN. Nick is an Australian who splits his time between New York and San Francisco.

Provide your rating for this post
If you liked this post, please use the buttons to the left to share it with a friend or post it on social media. Thank you!

Leave a Reply

Read more

Product Velocity: Get Feedback!

Getting feedback from your customers and internal stakeholders will ensure that you can sustain momentum generated from new product velocity.

Change.org Product VP on Driving Product Velocity

Driving product velocity requires analysis of features that aren't delivering at max capacity, eliminating them to focus on what's working

Innovating With Low-Velocity Products

There's plenty of room to innovate with low-velocity products - solving complex problems with innovative approaches for customers.

Low-Velocity Products: Simplifying Complex Problems

Managing users and keeping them engaged is a significant challenge for product managers who focus on low-velocity products.

Zillow fmr Product Lead on Low-Velocity Products

Look beyond usage rate to understand the impact of low-velocity products, as they provide meaningful solutions to complex/expensive issues.

Sign-in / Register for Free

Don’t be left behind in your career. Join a growing community of over 500K Product professionals committed to building great products. Register for FREE today and get access to :

  • All eBooks
  • All Infographics
  • Product Award resources
  • Search for other members

Coming soon for members only: personalized content, engagement, and networking.