Are You Actually Getting Better at AI? Talent.com CPTO Built a System That Tells You the Truth

Everyone is using AI, but almost no one can tell you if they are actually getting better at AI. In this episode of Product Talk hosted by Hoda Mehr, Co-founder and CEO of Up My Mojo and Board Member of Products That Count, Talent.com CPTO Navya Rehani Gupta speaks on the self learning system she built to make AI capability development measurable and self improving at the executive level. Navya walks through exactly how she went from using AI as a learning tool to building a full operating system called Synergy that scores her weekly across five dimensions, catches mistake patterns before they compound, and delivers the signal she needs every morning to lead product, engineering, and go to market teams without becoming the bottleneck.

Join us for new conversations with leading product executives every week. Roll through the highlights of this week’s event below, then head on over to our Events page to see which product leaders will be joining us next week.

Show Notes:

1. Using AI more and getting better at AI are two completely different things. Most product leaders sense a gap in how they are using AI but have no feedback loop to confirm it. Without measurement, they keep using the same habits they formed six months ago while the tools evolve around them.
2. The real metric is not hours saved. It is reach. Navya saved 16 hours a week, but the more meaningful outcome was her ability to run product, engineering, sales, marketing, and customer success with a lean team without becoming the bottleneck. That is a reach story, not a productivity story.
3. Start with the problem, not the tools. When everyone around you is chasing the next agentic AI tool, the product leader instinct to ask “what problem am I actually solving?” is the most grounding and strategic move you can make. The tools follow naturally once the problem is clear.
4. Your AI needs a user guide just like your team members do. Navya had always shared a working preferences document with new human teammates. She gave the same thing to her AI, and it became the foundation of her entire system. Your AI cannot serve you well without knowing how you think, decide, and communicate.
5. The critical difference between a human teammate and an AI is memory. A human remembers your feedback, feels the embarrassment of a mistake, and adjusts. AI shows up the next day completely confident and makes the exact same mistake. You have to build a system that creates the memory it lacks.
6. Three files are the foundation of a self learning AI system. An operating manual that captures your working style, a post mortem log that records every mistake so patterns can be caught automatically, and a learning journal that updates after every session with what was done and what should carry forward.
7. A scoring system turns vague impressions into honest data. Without a structured assessment, it is easy to feel productive when you are just busy. A weekly score across five dimensions tells you where you actually stand and where the tools have evolved beyond your current habits.
8. The five dimensions worth scoring yourself on are automation, learning and memory, custom workflows, tool integration, and token cost awareness. Each one represents a different kind of leverage, and together they form a complete picture of whether you are extracting real value from your AI or just using it casually.
9. Learning and memory is the single dimension that compounds the most. The more context your AI holds about your goals, your mistakes, and your working patterns, the better every session becomes. Investing here first delivers the highest long term return.
10. Automation scores should not stay flat for two weeks. Navya’s Friday email does not just say she can do better. It tells her exactly which capabilities in the tools have evolved in the past two weeks that she has not yet adopted. That specificity is what makes it actionable rather than discouraging.
11. Being busy and being better are not the same thing. All AI tools are optimized for engagement. Spending five hours in Claude does not mean you are improving. The Friday self assessment cuts through the noise and tells you what actually moved.
12. A score of 10 is not the goal and by design will never happen. The tools are evolving faster than any human can match. The goal is to improve by even half a point each week and to build the operating discipline to keep asking what the two or three changes are that actually matter this week, while ignoring the other thirty that do not.
13. Catching and codifying mistake patterns is the highest leverage thing you can do in the first weeks. Navya had 25 rules captured from mistakes her AI made repeatedly before she built the auto identification system. The shift from manually correcting to systematically preventing is where compounding begins.
14. The minimum viable setup requires no code at all. Configure your AI tool with your working preferences written in natural language. That is it. You will not notice the difference in week one. By week two you will be more efficient. By month one you will feel it clearly.
15. Claude automatically loads a file called claude.md on every session start. This is the technical anchor of the whole system. Navya extended it to also load her three supporting files so that every session begins with full context about her goals, her preferences, and the mistakes the system has already learned to avoid.
16. The question to ask when starting is not “how do I use this tool?” but “how do I get the most leverage from this team member?” Reframing AI as a colleague you are onboarding rather than a product you are using changes everything about how you interact with it.
17. AI native leaders are not the ones who have adopted the most tools. They are the ones in permanent learning mode who can articulate exactly how they are improving. The competitive edge belongs to people who are adaptive, who build systems around their own growth, and who refuse to confuse motion with momentum.
18. The leaders who define the next decade are not the most tool savvy. They are the ones who use tools intentionally to clear a path toward the work only humans can do. Judgment, relationships, direction setting, and leading people through genuine uncertainty are not automatable. Everything else is infrastructure.
19. AI will not replace humans. It will replace the version of you that never asked the harder questions about your own job. That distinction is worth sitting with. The threat is not the technology. It is the absence of intentionality.
20. The full Synergy system is documented and publicly available at synergy-nrg.com. Everything Navya shared in this episode, her frameworks, her architecture, her case studies, and the technical setup, is there and auto updated as she continues to learn. No coding required to start building your own version.